Thursday, August 20, 2009

Senior Pastor Model?

STR.org:
This is sad. Another pastor taken down by sin. Now, I think these cases are the exception. Our churches are largely filled with good men and women who lead. But the fall of pastors is still too prevalent and it has me thinking about the "Senior Pastor" model. The liabilities are many:

#1 - The senior pastor is looked to primarily for leadership that reflects charisma rather than character. When there’s a single primary pastor, whether consciously or unconsciously, he alone is relied upon to be the “face” of the ministry. And in our culture, it’s charisma not character that makes a lasting first impression on people. Therefore, many churches depend upon his celebrity status to represent their ministry. New attenders, enamored by a personality, choose to join a church primarily on that basis. Indeed, in many cases a senior pastor’s character is an afterthought.

#2 - The body of believers is much more susceptible to the development of an unhealthy co-dependence on the senior pastor. The “Senior Pastor” model, when combined with the widespread dysfunction found in American culture, encourages a co-dependent relationship between pastor and parishoner that is detrimental to the spiritual health of the body. Thus, the typical believer experiences an unhealthy need to connect with the senior pastor on some level before he or she can connect to that particular church.

# 3 - The personality of the senior pastor begins to dominate church life. When there is so much dependence placed upon a single leader, his strengths and weaknesses tend to shape the body life of the church. His strengths become the emphasis of the church, no matter how unbalanced. In addition, his weaknesses, unable to be counter-balanced by other leaders, are likely to become the weaknesses of the church.

#4 - The senior pastor model encourages the body of believers to become spectators. Since the senior pastor is the “professional” minister who is paid to do the work of the ministry, the body is enabled to sit back and watch him and his staff do their job. Thus, the large majority of significant ministry is carried out by the paid staff of a particular church.

#5 - When a senior pastor falls, the damage is immense. When there is so much dependence upon a single leader, the effects of his sin and shortcomings are multiplied exponentially. In contrast to the elevated status of the senior pastor, the lesser roles of associate pastor or support staff do little to mitigate against the damage to the body.

Could it be these liabilities are the result of an unbiblical model of church leadership? A biblical model should provide us with a structure that mitigates against these weaknesses. I'm sure that church in Compton is going to be reeling for some time.

3 comments:

Andrew Ford said...

We led our congregation to a flatter style of leadership - moving away from the Senior Pastor model. Many of the reasons listed here connect with why we made the change. Three of us co-pastors share leadership and the pulpit.

Brent Miller said...

I think the senior pastor model does fit the bible when measured against this story. It says many will preach the gospel for selfish and financial gain, but that is OK as long as the gospel is preached. As for leadership and a church's dependency on the senior pastor's it is the same even in a co-lead model, becasue one of the co-leaders will be the leader and leadership always sets the tone of the church/team/organization/etc... Co-leaders are as suseptible to temptation and falling, so be careful that in defense of a model we prefer that we say another is not bibilial. I think the church is all of us lost saved by grace, being lead by those who were lost and are saved by grace.

Christopher Lake said...

5Millers,

If the senior pastor model fits the Bible, where is it in the Bible? The churches in the Bible (the churches in Rome, Corinth, Galatia, Ephesus, Philippi) are led by multiple elders. None of them is led by a senior pastor.