There’s a challenging piece by Stratford Caldecott over at Godspy on Christian dialogue with Islam. Caldecott starts with the Pope’s recent (controversial) comments about the Christianity/Islam dialogue and tries to sound out what, exactly, Christians might have to say to a major religion that is (or should be) going through a fierce internal debate about violence, proselytism, and the relationship between faith and reason. That’s a debate that should look awfully familiar to anyone who’s studied Christian history.
The most common evangelical response to the topic of Islam seems to be to view the Islamic faith as a spiritual enemy to be confronted, a demographic in great need of evangelism, or both—and I think those can both be appropriate ways to approach Islam. But Caldecott suggests that however we respond, it’s important that Christianity and Islam be able to talk to each other. Islam sits at the edge of a precipice, at risk of collapsing into “ideology and tyranny.” Christianity itself has, by the grace of God, waded through very similar waters in its history. Might our experience be put to use in helping Islam to escape the violent and tyrannical elements within itself?
Do Christians have a responsibility or opportunity to help prevent the spread of violent, Wahhabi-style Islam? Encouraging the development of a more tolerant, reflective Islam might reduce the worldwide threat of terrorism and religious extremism, and it might establish a common vocabulary through which we might share the Gospel message with Muslims. But is it a step away from the Great Commission to “help” a non-Christian religion in this manner? Can the Christian church serve God by temporarily setting aside its evangelistic mission and focusing on the practical challenge of trying to help prevent Islam’s fall into ideological tyranny?
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
A More Moderate Engagement with Islam?
Andy from ThinkChristian.net says:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Q: "Do Christians have a responsibility or opportunity to help prevent the spread of violent, Wahhabi-style Islam?"
A: Of course. The gospel is the power of God not only for spiritual salvation, but also change in this world, not only to the Jews, but also to the Gentiles.
Q: "But is it a step away from the Great Commission to “help” a non-Christian religion in this manner?"
A: No, why would we step away from the gospel when we know that it could triumph over the problem?
Q: "Can the Christian church serve God by temporarily setting aside its evangelistic mission and focusing on the practical challenge of trying to help prevent Islam’s fall into ideological tyranny?"
A: No. And yikes. Serve God by setting aside his appointed means for the conversion and salvation of Muslim? To suggest that political and social manueverings might be a better answer to the violence of Islam than the gospel is tantamount to denying the power of the Spirit and the gospel itself.
In order to overcome the violence of Islam, we shouldn't side step the gospel, when its the very thing that will overcome such violence. What would we be accomplishing by creating a less violent, but still false, religion? Since when do we set the agenda for how to serve God? "You see God, we're just trying to smooth out some problems with Islam, when we have this work completed, we'll return to world missions." And who's to say that after setting the gospel aside to overcome violence in Islam that we would ever return to it?
In sum, I think it is hubris to imagine that we could concoct a better solution to the problems of this world than the the solution that God created, the gospel. We will never live in a perfectly free and peaceful world (so I'm not post-mil, sue me), in fact we are called to suffering (Phil 1) and evil men will grow worse and worse (2 Tim 3). The promise is not that we'll live free from evil, but that through suffering that our faith will be strengthened (James 1), we'll become heirs of God by enduring it (Rom 8), and it will produce endurance, character, and hope (Rom 5). The only thing that can triumph over an inherently violent and evil religious system is the gospel.
Post a Comment