Monday, April 27, 2009

Snapshots of Religious Life

John Ortberg:

Snapshot: In the entertainment section of The San Francisco Chronicle recently, someone asked Mick LaSalle, the movie critic, what kind of movie will never be re-made. He answered by pointing to films like Going My Way, and forties films that starred Bing Crosby as a young parish priest. Religion is simply no longer accepted as part of the national fabric, he said. The one kind of movie that is most unlikely to be re-made today is one that assumes faith as a kind of national backdrop.

Snapshot: I was talking to some young church leaders recently about how, twenty years ago, if someone wanted to look for a model of what an effective church might look like in the future, they would generally go to a place like Willow Creek or Saddleback. But these younger leaders said it was no longer apparent where they should go to see what church might look like in another twenty years.

Snapshot: Tom Klegg and Warren Bird noted that if the unchurched population in the US were its own nation, it would be the fifth most populated nation on the planet, after China, the former Soviet Union, India, and Brazil.

Snapshot: A religion reporter for the LA Times wrote an article, and later a book, describing how he lost his faith in the process of covering his beat. He said that article brought in exponentially more positive emails than anything else he’d ever written.

All of which leads me to ask: Are we witnessing the process of secularization here in America similar to what Europe experienced in the middle of the twentieth century?

It’s not a matter of new evidence being introduced that makes the message of Jesus less likely to be true. What makes a living faith cease to be a live option is much more subtle and complex. It often has more to do with cultural shifts and attitudes that move gradually over time until a tipping point suddenly reveals them.

The question is not one of Kingdom Anxiety. The Kingdom of God has been doing very well, and will continue to flourish no matter the ebbs of flows from one century and continent to another. Phillip Jenkins has aptly chronicled how the explosion of the church in our day has shifted East and South.

He has also, in his most recent fascinating book, chronicled how Christianity was deeply rooted in much of the Middle East, Asia, and Africa for over 800 years, only to die out over centuries.

I hope what we are witnessing in the United States is not such a trend. I don’t have any magic answers if it is. But it’s a good thing to lift our heads up out of our own churches and projects, and look around the neighborhood.

By the way, if you’re involved in helping to lead a church, and you wonder whether giving it the best you have to offer matters—it does.
Read the rest.

6 comments:

Unknown said...

more and more churches seem to be moving away from mega and into missional community. what are your thoughts on that (as a trend or outlook on the future of the church)?

Vitamin Z said...

Brian,

Yeah, I think I tend to agree. Seems that (generally speaking, not always) the mega-model just feeds our American notions of consumerism.

z

John C said...

Can the mega model not be missional too? You get a lot of missional power when you energize and empower 20,000 people (not including 4 regional campuses) to be missional. You should check out what all Willow is doing in this regard. Last week (for the 2nd year in a row) the entire congregation as a whole was encouraged to eat nothing but rice, beans, and tap water, in order to resonate with the poor in africa. THEN - take the money saved on groceries for the week and donate that to the efforts Willow is doing for their operation Hope. I know dozens of whole families - kids and all - that did this. See http://tinyurl.com/cac3fn and http://tinyurl.com/d2afob.

An excerpt telling about what was done last year:

"Last year we joined together to make a difference in the fight against global hunger. More than 15,000 of us packed and provided 3.6 million meals for Feed My Starving Children, feeding 10,000 children in Zimbabwe for a year. Together we donated an additional $350,000 to our ministry partners in Africa and Latin America, for long-term solutions to hunger. Our hearts were opened as we immersed ourselves in learning about the plight of the poor—and realized we could do something about it."

John C said...

btw - if you haven't checked out Willow's new site lately - you owe it to yourself to do so - some very cool stuff - especially pictures. click on the "Celebration of Hope" banner in the lower right hand corner for more info on that.

http://www.willowcreek.org

Unknown said...

Zach,
I used the term "Customer" today to describe those that just show up on Sunday and take in but don't live it out... someone in my community group got offended by that term. but, it seems true, the mega-church model does feed our consumerism mentality.

John,
I'm not aware of what Willow is doing, i'll check out the links. Sounds awesome.

By "missional community" though, i'm thinking more of where Christians are in their neighborhoods in partnershp with other Christians to build relationships and reach the neighborhood/city with the gospel.

I'm not sure if Willow is following that model. I know some other large churches are doing something like this, Mars Hill in Seattle being one of them - and Acts29 helping other churches build a missional community model.

John C said...

@Brian:

"By "missional community" though, i'm thinking more of where Christians are in their neighborhoods in partnershp with other Christians to build relationships and reach the neighborhood/city with the gospel."Willow (and most Willow model churches I know) have always done that since it's inception in 1975. Most people don't get that for some reason. In my mind, it's been "missional" from the very start. It was always about building relationships with neighbors, co-workers, family, etc. in any way possible - taking the church out into the community. Now: it used to be a lot more about "bringing them to church" in the end - and I realize that's not necessarily a hallmark of the "Missional movement" - which I don't 100% agree how bringing someone to church that you're building a relationship with leading towards Christ is a bad thing - but anyway - that's now not as much the "end" emphasis now days. They're doing a LOT with neighborhood ministries - both in the burbs, and especially in the inner city. (not to mention global outreach to millions.) I have a friend who has a neighborhood group of families that meets regularly in different settings but not all of them go to church. But it's having a great impact. With the regional sites and "neighborhood" ministries as they're calling it now, they're reaching all over the Chicago metro area - and downtown with the city location. People don't tend to see all of this unless they actually attend there and get to know what's going on. Yet, "mega" churches keep getting slammed for some reason when, at least at Willow anyway, they're having a huge impact and looking more and more like the contemporary "missional" model in my eyes. But whatever you call it, to me, they've always been missional from day one. Different structure and ways of going about that, but very much in a huge way about building trusted relationships and impacting the neighborhoods and communities. (I was a 15 year attender and 10 year staff member btw.)