Tuesday, August 11, 2009

How To Pick Good Music For Church

In a recent edition of Breakpoint, Charles Colson cites Donald Williams with some helpful thoughts on how to select music for the church. From the article:

Much of today’s music is of poor quality, he writes. But so was some music written centuries ago. The difference is the old hymns have endured a centuries-long weeding-out process. If we hope to identify the best new music, Williams writes, we must know “those marks of excellence that made the best of the past stand out and survive so long.”

These marks of excellence “are not arbitrary.” They “are derived from biblical teaching about the nature of worship.” They come, Williams writes, “from an understanding of the nature of music and how it can support those biblical goals.”

Among these marks of excellence is biblical truth. Lyrics need not to be literal Scripture, but they do have to be faithful to it.

Another mark of excellence—theological profundity. Think of how the words to this great hymn encourage us to worship God with our minds:

Immortal, invisible, God only wise
In light inaccessible hid from our eyes

By contrast, some contemporary choruses are often “so simplistic and repetitive that theological reflection never has a chance to get started,” Williams says.

A third mark of excellence is poetic richness. For instance, the use of a question in the hymn “What Child is This?” helps us capture “the wonder of the Incarnation.” In “Amazing Grace,” the word “wretch,” Williams notes, is “a simple but evocative” choice.

A fourth mark is musical beauty. In great music, “there are certain contours, structures, and cadences that make for a singable melody.” And the right harmony “can make that melody more memorable . . .,” he writes. For instance, “Be Thou My Vision” “rises and falls like an ocean wave or a sine curve.”...

Now, some songwriters are creating excellent music today. But, warns Williams, only those musicians who are musically gifted, and historically, biblically, and theologically trained are qualified to help churches choose the best new music “as a supplement to the church’s rich musical heritage.”

Read the rest.

(HT: STR.org)

More good thoughts on this topic from Ron Man.


As I have grown older, my admiration for older music has certainly increased. I listen to much more music these days (jazz, classical, etc) that has stood the test of time and not just the test of
"can this sell a 14-year-old with lots of expendable income?". I'm not sure why this is, but pop music just doesn't quite do it for me anymore. Maybe I am actually maturing (my wife has prayed for this for years).

We would do well to heed Williams' advice above. I have said this before on this blog, but my experience tells me that having the ability to select the right songs and also selecting the right people to play those songs would diminish about 80% of our conflicts in church over music. Seems that those two facets are often overlooked.

5 comments:

Jason Kanz said...

"But, warns Williams, only those musicians who are musically gifted, and historically, biblically, and theologically trained are qualified to help churches choose the best new music 'as a supplement to the church’s rich musical heritage.'”

Hmmm...interesting (and ironic) juxtaposition with the thread about Bob Kauflin directly above it.

Vitamin Z said...

Jason,

I'm not sure I agree that this is a disconnect. I think we should strive for having "historically, biblically, and theologically trained" people led us, but at the same time if we don't we shouldn't allow that to hidden our hearts from rejoicing in song to what God has done.

z

Jason Kanz said...

This is a tough issue. On the whole I agree with you. In addition to their committment to proper exegesis in preaching, churches have a similar duty to provide music that does not water down, or frankly disagree with, scripture.

With that said, I have all too frequently encountered a culture of musical snobbery that has no place in the church. Some cogent examples include: 1) Dirk Mouw, with whom I had the pleasure of serving on the Geneva Lecture Committee at the University of Iowa, once said that any song written during the 20th century had no place in church hymnody. 2) Rod Jiskoot, my Music of the Church professor in college had a very high brow view of what was appropriate music for the church, which I suspect in his case (somewhat tongue in cheek) only involved a large pipe organ. I respect both of these men a great deal, yet I believe they were both misguided in their limited view of church music.

I am certain my perspective comes from my current situation, where I attend a church that calls pastors from among the congregants and the music team consists of all volunteers. This church is healthier and more Biblically grounded than many churches I have attended where there is a seminary trained pastor in the pulpit who works for a paycheck rather than out of a desire to help people meet Jesus. I guess the question is, are we somehow inferior because we do not require "historically, biblically, and theologically trained" leaders, or is "trained" subject to clearer definition?

Thanks, as always, for thought provoking posts.

Rich said...

Great, great post.

I don't believe that "only those musicians who are musically gifted and hitorically, biblically, and theologically trained are qualified to help churches choose the best new music" is an argument for "high brow" music.

I also believe that Bob Kauflin fits that description just fine. I agree with the quote and would expect no less from a music minister. I also don't believe that this standard blocks the local church congregant volunteer minister. If your volunteer is not informed historically, biblically, or theologically, then they should at least have a passion and a desire to become informed and be willing to learn. You don't have to go to seminary to become historically, biblically, and theologically informed.

again, good post.

Jason Kanz said...

So I have yet another question. Do you believe a person can a person feel connected to God and a sense of deep, devoted worship through simple, repetitive choruses, which Williams indicated is not a sign of good music? If not, what then do we make of Revelation 4 where we read of the angels singing "Holy, Holy, Holy is the Lord God Almighty" over and over.

Thought provoking stuff, guys.