Saturday, September 20, 2008

"You Can't Legislate Morality!"

See if these comments from MLK Jr. apply to the debate about abortion and all those that I have been discussing this with lately who keep telling me that laws against abortion don't matter because you can't legislate morality.

Martin Luther King Jr.:
Now the other myth that gets around is the idea that legislation cannot really solve the problem and that it has no great role to play in this period of social change because you’ve got to change the heart and you can’t change the heart through legislation. You can’t legislate morals. The job must be done through education and religion. Well, there’s half-truth involved here. Certainly, if the problem is to be solved then in the final sense, hearts must be changed. Religion and education must play a great role in changing the heart. But we must go on to say that while it may be true that morality cannot be legislated, behavior can be regulated. It may be true that the law cannot change the heart but it can restrain the heartless. It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me but it can keep him from lynching me and I think that is pretty important, also. So there is a need for executive orders. There is a need for judicial decrees. There is a need for civil rights legislation on the local scale within states and on the national scale from the federal government.

-Taken from Martin Luther King, Jr.’s address at Western Michigan University, December 18, 1963, cited in The Case for Life: Equipping Christians to Engage the Culture by Scott Klusendorf (forthcoming).

(HT: JT)

3 comments:

dead dog from Lodebar said...

Amen, thanks for all the thoughtful blogs on abortion.

Anonymous said...

King has put words to my thoughts

Jared said...

"You can't legislate morality" is perhaps THE worst of the approaches from the pro-choice crowd.

We legislate morality all the time. We have laws against robbery, murder, providing false testimony, having sex with children and animals, etc etc etc
We have laws against those things because we "somehow" understand that these things are wrong.

The response to that is usually, "No, we have laws against them because they are detrimental to society," which is a moral judgment in itself. Who decides what's detrimental to society? Why is doing something detrimental to society a bad thing?

You can't talk ethics or laws without talking morality.
At least, not with any integrity.